Ruben Navarrette: It really ought to be `illegal' (as in immigrants)

[Twoller]

Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore

....

Those on the pro-immigrant left have shown considerable courage in taking on Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Minutemen vigilantes, border walls and an endless supply of lame immigration enforcement measures.

....

Why would this guy start by posing those who actively support enforcement against illegal immigration as dangerous villains and then turn around and defend the use of the term "illegal immigrant"? Why use the term when the term suggests the attention of law enforcement and any concerned law abiding citizen? In the same sentence where he condemns law and civil enforcers, he claims that their enforcement is "lame". It almost sounds like he is saying their efforts or weak and inaffectual. But that can't be it if it requres "courage in taking [them] on". What does he mean by "courage", what does he mean by "taking on", what does he mean by "lame ... enforcement measures"?

This guy doesn't play the middle, he just talks out of both sides of his face at the same time.

[usa today]

He takes heat also on the hispanic forums

[Twoller]

Originally Posted by usa today

He takes heat also on the hispanic forums

For what?

[usa today]

Originally Posted by Twoller

For what?

Because for one thing they firmly believe they have a right to be here whenever and however they want , they believe whites are the illegals

Ruben is a shill for open borders but he doesn't believe what they do

Also they firmly toe the line on "no human is illegal"

He does want open amnesty and reconquista , but not how they want it.