Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > Associates in Action

Associates in Action SOS associates may propose events, activities and projects in the pursuit of our agenda.

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2010, 10:30 AM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default

Again we see small mindedness and petty actions. No one organization or person can dictate to the public or their own members without losing some of their loyalty. This is something this organization has learned. There will always be people who will criticize others over petty things, thinking they're doing it for the good of others, but in reality they do it for their own feeling of superiority.

Chelene is nothing, just someone trying to use what she has available to her to try to get somewhere. Which in reality will be like a one hit band. In a short time no one will remember the song or who sung it. Barbara is like a promoter of someone with so little talent that she knows she has to shore Chelene up or Chelene will get knocked down before she's allowed to take even one step forward. I just don't put much thought or energy into anything Chelene does, because in a short time, as in today, no one really cares about Chelene and of Chelene's position on anything, or what and who will vote for her. She's going no where and her biggest fan is Chelene herself.


Barbara is dreaming of recognition for herself and CCIR through the few connections Chelene can talk her way into. But the majority of the public consider Chelene a fringe and that's where she'll stay. Barbara will really receive no loss no gain, but that too could also depends on how badly Chelene gets knocked out.

It is really too bad Barbara has taken this position, but it has no effect on our organization. Actually we had 3 CCIR members at the rally yesterday.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2010, 05:06 PM
Papoose's Avatar
Papoose Papoose is offline
Love One Another.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Mexifornia
Posts: 167
Default

This one is truly a shocker. It's really too bad that Ms. Coe would take this position and the probable reasons behind it. I always thought of her as someone who would take a side, but that it would be the side of principle. CCIR will still have my personal support in their functions -maybe.

Last edited by Papoose; 01-18-2010 at 06:27 AM. Reason: After sleeping on this, I'm PISSED now!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2010, 09:40 AM
Eagle1 Eagle1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOTAZTLAN
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore View Post
Again we see small mindedness and petty actions. No one organization or person can dictate to the public or their own members without losing some of their loyalty. This is something this organization has learned. There will always be people who will criticize others over petty things, thinking they're doing it for the good of others, but in reality they do it for their own feeling of superiority.

Chelene is nothing, just someone trying to use what she has available to her to try to get somewhere. Which in reality will be like a one hit band. In a short time no one will remember the song or who sung it. Barbara is like a promoter of someone with so little talent that she knows she has to shore Chelene up or Chelene will get knocked down before she's allowed to take even one step forward. I just don't put much thought or energy into anything Chelene does, because in a short time, as in today, no one really cares about Chelene and of Chelene's position on anything, or what and who will vote for her. She's going no where and her biggest fan is Chelene herself.


Barbara is dreaming of recognition for herself and CCIR through the few connections Chelene can talk her way into. But the majority of the public consider Chelene a fringe and that's where she'll stay. Barbara will really receive no loss no gain, but that too could also depends on how badly Chelene gets knocked out.

It is really too bad Barbara has taken this position, but it has no effect on our organization. Actually we had 3 CCIR members at the rally yesterday.
I have excellent reason to suspect that Chelene has influenced Barbara Coe
with respect to her prejudice against SOS.

We are not to bow down to any other organization. If we are to get anything done we must act. If other organizations don't like what we do they don't have to. We have no masters. We are independent of all other organizations
and this policy from CCIR regarding us is a good reason to never join a "coalition".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2010, 09:56 AM
Papoose's Avatar
Papoose Papoose is offline
Love One Another.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Mexifornia
Posts: 167
Default

Well said. And shame on those who would even allow their fellow patriots and friends (whom they've fought besides for years) to go into harm's way alone because of some BULLSHIT started by a few! Does ANYONE have any principles or courage anymore???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle1 View Post
We are not to bow down to any other organization. If we are to get anything done we must act. If other organizations don't like what we do they don't have to. We have no masters. We are independent of all other organizations
and this policy from CCIR regarding us is a good reason to never join a "coalition".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2010, 10:14 AM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default

I remember when we all marched together. No one was pointing fingers and refusing to participate. I have never had Robin or Raymond harm me or ever claim a different stance than me on illegal immigration. The fight between Gilchrist and others is THEIR FIGHT, NOT MINE. It is childish to expect others to join you in a squabble that they had nothing to do with. We are not a clique that draws a line and TELLS OTHERS who they should or shouldn't stand next to. I know who I don't particularly care for and yet that doesn't mean I won't stand next to that person if their enemy is my enemy. Our priority is fighting amnesty, not each other.

Barbara you're wrong on this one. We are not part of that clique. I understand you have your reasons but not everyone who associated with Gilchrist is on the wrong side. Remember, Barbara, you marched with him in Hollywood just as the rest of us did. What went down between you and Gilchrist should never have happened and he's paying a price for that. But I refuse to condemn others who were not part of that action. I judge them by their own actions, just as I judge you Barbara.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2010, 01:02 PM
Eagle1 Eagle1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOTAZTLAN
Posts: 406
Default

The effects of the Coe vs Gilchrist legal suite brought a tremendous amount of divisiveness to the movement. Some people refuse to let the issue die. Instead the divisiveness has spawned a number of proponents of "if you associate with them you can't associate with us". Of course anyone who does not abide is in some way publicly humiliated and declared to be a traitor.

I recall when Chelene made efforts to get a number of organizations together to "police" everyone. People were contacted about the content of their websites and with regards to things said or written thus a miniature version of "A New World Order" and a form of "PC" for the movement was instituted.

Stalinistic purges of the old Save our State were conducted by Chelene with
the result that good men and women were declared "moles", agents for the other side and such without end. I recall SZ, Old Preach and a host of others having been subjected to this insanity by a creature whose vanity and self dedication knows no limits.

The coalition, or SoCal coalition was born with the result that a number of folks were again contacted regarding 1st amendment issues. "Don't say this, take that video out, listen to us, obey, don't associate with him or her, we know what is good for the movement."

At the heart of all of that was and is Chelene.

What all of these people who are trying so hard to control everyone through acts of intimidation and humiliation need is a version of the Declaration of Independence served on them as a wakeup call for the disrespect and outright bullshit that they have put everyone through.

They have become an obstacle to the freedom of association needed in order to rally as we did once arm in arm with everyone.


People know when someone has limited their freedoms and put choker chains on them. It is an awful feeling to wake up and realize that you are under scrutiny and that action will be taken against you for associating, rallying or giving a speech with people whose organizational allegiance may be different than ours but whom are just as patriotic as the rest of us and who have repeatedly put themselves in harms way for our nation.

At SOS we have an opportunity to restore the integrity of this movement
and with all due respect to all of those "leaders" out there if you are an obstacle to the objective of unity because of your bad experiences with one another then just stay away and do your own damned thing.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2010, 01:36 PM
Eagle1 Eagle1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOTAZTLAN
Posts: 406
Default Email from CCIR Regarding SOS

I would ask all who read this email that Barabara Coe is indeed a patriot and has been in the fight longer than many of us have. That she would categorize SOS as she has and publicly issue a statement of non support is indeed bizarre and probably due to present associations that she has. Still there is an issue of personal responsibility here.

If we are patient she may see that we are patriots one and all.
Unfortunately our country is out of time.

Perhaps some of you may want to contact her in a civil and polite fashion and begin a dialogue with her to mend relations if you think it wise or needed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

All....

Do you agree with Chelene Nightingale's message? If so, below is how you can support her as a candidate for CA Governor:

Financial Support: Check her website www.nightingaleforgovernor.com to donate by credit card or by check or money order.

Registration (Filing Fee) and Vote Support: There are TWO dedicated patriots who are AIP (American Independent Party) candidates for state office:
1. CHELENE NIGHTINGALE: CA Governor
2. ROBERT LAUTEN: CA Treasurer

Many of us are registered Republicans, Dems, Libertarians, etc. However, If you wish to support and vote for these PATRIOT candidates:

a) Obtain a VOTER REGISTRATION FORM from the Post Office, Library, or Registrar of Voters [ROV] in YOUR area.
b) Complete it, noting your Party as "American Independent Party" and HAND it to the ROV or MAIL it to the ROV in YOUR area.
c) This changes your Party affiliation and allows you to:
1. SIGN their Registration (Filing Fee) form (saving them $20+ per signature)- a GREAT savings for them & does not cost YOU a dime!
2. Authorizes YOU to VOTE for them in the CA PRIMARY ELECTION - June 7, 2010.
d) AFTER the 6/7/10 Primary election, if you choose to rejoin your ORIGINAL Party, simply obtain a VOTER REGISTRATION FORM and "re-register" as a member of that Party. This authorizes you to vote for ANY candidate of ANY Party in the GENERAL ELECTION in Nov 2010.

I hope I have shared procedure accurately. If not, please advise.
BC

PS: Re SOS (Save Our State), neither of our former patriot champions, JOE TURNER or CHELENE NIGHTINGALE now head this once great patriot organization.

CCIR has learned that some whom we believed were dedicated PATRIOTS, have betrayed our trust. CCIR will not support any of the "new" SOS efforts.

PPS: FG: I trusted you with my LIFE. How could you do this?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2010, 02:45 PM
Kathy63 Kathy63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 380
Default

This is the bottom line of what is wrong with anti criminal alien efforts. I have met Barbara Coe several times. She is a wonderful woman and a superlative activist who has taken more than her share of slings and stones.

The movement itself is flawed (not the principle of the movement, but the flaws of the personalities involved) because the people in it continually put personalities above principles. They cannot put together any kind of recognizable force because of personality conflicts. Whereas La Raza can put half a million people on the streets, our side can barely get ten or twelve. They take everyone, no matter what they believe and our side can't stop pointing fingers. "If so and so goes, I'm not going" There's way too much of that going on. Everyone wants to be the biggest fish in the pond. The loyalty required is the loyalty to the "right" person rather than the right goal.

Sad sad.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved