Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > Elections, Politics, and Partisanship

Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2010, 11:17 AM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default California congressman extends DREAM Act tweet war through the weekend

California congressman extends DREAM Act tweet war through the weekend
By Bridget Johnson - 12/12/10 07:53 PM ET
Sen. Bernie Sanders captured the Web's attention Friday with his filibuster against President Obama's tax-cut deal with Republicans while Rep. Dana Rohrabacher staged his own weekend tweet-buster against the DREAM Act.
The California Republican continued his war of tweets into Sunday over the bill that provides a pathway to citizenship for children of illegal immigrants with certain military and schooling requirements, but he shifted his arguments toward another Twitter user.
Rohrabacher began debating a user named @alesolo who identified herself as being from Orange County — which falls in his district — after she retweeted video on Friday of a floor speech in which the lawmaker said, "Those voting for this so-called DREAM Act are voting to relegate the position of non-minority American citizens to behind those who are now in this country illegally."
On Saturday evening, the debate had come to this tweet by Rohrabacher:
@alesolo My kin arrived in 1709 before gov benefits & racist preferences. Should your family's educ/medical$ go to illegals? Are U selfish?
To which she responded:
@DanaRohrabacher so early immigrants did not take "benefits" in the form of resources and land from native Americans?
And the congressman replied:
.@alesolo Indians lost their country to foreigners. I'm not letting that happen to us w/out a fight. Which side are you & your friends on?
Rohrabacher also responded to another handful of Twitter users:
.@theSoniaG @izofice @rigo_ @P1Lal @raylab @LouiShoeGem You know you've won when opponents call you names rather than address your argument
@alesolo chimed back this tweet:
@DanaRohrabacher nobody is trying to "take" this country. We are all welcome here and we will coexist. That's the beauty of humanity.

But both she and the congressman moved on to new DREAM Act sparring partners, with Rohrabacher engaged in tweet warfare with a blogger in San Francisco, Denis Yurchikov, who fired several tweets including:
@DanaRohrabacher Your only argument seems to be that white people will be hurt by the legalization of students. That's illogical.
The congressman fired back:
.@yurchie Illegals bid down the wages of taxpaying Americans. Health care & ed then provided to illegals. Americans lose. DANA
@yurchie said:
.@DanaRohrabacher You might be betraying your country by not helping out your new generation of innovators and educators.
And Rohrabacher tweeted:
.@yurchie Do u believe people who are here illegally should have preference over US citizens. Is this not a betrayal of our fellow citizens?
.@yurchie Racially based preferences for-among other things- jobs, admission, loans, training programs are mandated by various laws.
And the blogger responded:
@DanaRohrabacher You've gone completely off-topic. This isn't about racial preferences.
@DanaRohrabacher You're all about white people huh?
As the weekend drew to a close, the congressman kept firing:
.@yurchie Americans=every race. All should have priority over illegals. Amnesty triggers pref already in law. Pointing this out isn't racist
http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-roo...gh-the-weekend
Lawmakers Engage in Lengthy “Twitter-busters” on DREAM Act, Tax Cuts
Filibusters can effectively stall legislation for a time, but the marathon congressional floor speeches can also cramp legs and dry throats. Twitter users, however, don't need tradition or decorum to "tweet" as many times as they please - as long as they limit each message to 140 characters. This past week, two lawmakers demonstrated that putting the two together creates a powerful rhetorical hybrid: the Twitter-buster.California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher's Wednesday floor speech against what he called the "Affirmative Action Amnesty Act" did not stop the House from passing the DREAM Act. But that night, Rohrabacher took the debate to the social network Twitter, where he would never have to yield his floor time back to anyone. The back-and-forth lasted into late Sunday night.
On Friday, Twitter user @alesolo re-tweeted video of the Republican's feisty floor speech against the controversial legislation, which would create a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants brought to the United States by their parents, provided they attend college or serve in the military.
"Libs put racist preferences into law. Illegals' status normalized=preferences apply to them=betrayal of Americans by racist libs," Rohrabacher replied to @alesolo, who identified herself as being from Orange County, parts of which are located in the lawmaker's Southern California district.The exchange continued into Saturday night, when Rohrabacher tweeted, "@alesolo My kin arrived in 1709 before gov benefits & racist preferences. Should your family's educ/medical$ go to illegals? Are U selfish?"@alesolo shot back, "So early immigrants did not take ‘benefits' in the form of resources and land from native Americans?"
Rohrabacher responded: "Indians lost their country to foreigners. I'm not letting that happen to us w/out a fight. Which side are you & your friends on?"The Southern California representative also engaged with a number of other Twitter users. San Francisco blogger Denis Yurkichov (@yurchie) at one point tweeted that Rohrabacher is "all about white people." The lawmaker replied Sunday night, "Americans=every race. All should have priority over illegals. Amnesty triggers pref already in law. Pointing this out isn't racist."Rohrabacher's lengthy back and forth came on the heels of fellow lawmaker Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) Friday filibuster-like rant on the Senate floor against Obama's tax rate extension compromise. Snippets from the speech, along with news articles and time counts, were tweeted through the senator's account as Sanders pontificated on Capitol Hill.
"You can call what I am doing today whatever you want, you it [sic] call it a filibuster, you can call it a very long speech..." Sanders' Twitter account announced at the beginning of the Senate soliloquy.An hour later, the Twitter hash tag "#filibuster" had been added to every update, and by 4:18 PM, the feed gleefully announced, "Sen. Bernie Sanders is trending FIRST in the nation right now. We will continue to tweet the senator's speech #filibuster." By that time, so many social network users took interest in his "very long speech" that Sanders was well on his way to becoming what the New York Times called a "Twitter sensation."


Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/20...#ixzz181andb93
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved