Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > Priority Topics Section > Immigration

Immigration Topics relating to the subject of US Immigration

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2010, 11:51 AM
StokeyBob's Avatar
StokeyBob StokeyBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 96
Default Deporting Illegal Immigrants

I just finished watching a movie about the French Revolution where they had a bunch of rich, corrupt aristocracy to deal with and they chose a Guillotine to do it with, but enough about that.

I also had a copy of The New American with a story in it in the study I think you would like. I'll reprint some excerpts here for you but you may want to take in the whole story at the links provided.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index....gal-immigrants

Deporting Illegal Immigrants

Written by Roger D. McGrath
Tuesday, 13 July 2010 00:00

Pardon me, but if I hear one more time that we can’t deport 12 million illegal aliens I’m headed for the backyard to howl at the moon. Is the American memory so short that we’ve already forgotten the 1950s? This writer is old enough to remember very clearly the mass deportation of illegal aliens that occurred in 1954 in what was officially termed “Operation ~~~back” (prior to the age of political correctness).

Anyone living in Southern California then, even a kid like me, couldn’t help but take notice of the operation that sent upwards of two million illegal aliens from all across the Southwest home to Mexico. It was done swiftly and cheaply by a relatively small force, proving that arguments we hear today about such an operation being logistically impossible are nothing more than a mask concealing a lack of political will.

During World War II, with so many Americans in the service — and fighting and dying overseas — Mexicans illegally entered the United States to take advantage of employment opportunities, especially as agricultural laborers. People seem to forget that most of those who worked in the farm fields of California during the 1930s were not Mexicans but “Okies,” a term applied collectively to the hundreds of thousands of migrants who poured out of not only Oklahoma but also Texas, Arkansas, and Missouri — and smaller numbers from Kansas and Colorado — and took Route 66 to the Golden State. By 1940, the Okies constituted about 12 percent of California’s population overall, 25 percent of the population of the agricultural San Joaquin Valley, and the bulk of farm labor. Following the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, though, the Okies began moving from the fields into the factories or the Armed Forces.

By the end of World War II, there were some two million illegal aliens living in California, Arizona, and Texas. U.S. citizens in those states began complaining that the Mexican illegals undercut the workingman’s wages, committed crimes, caused a general deterioration of the communities they lived in, gave birth to children at county expense, and sent older children to local schools — crowding classrooms and breaking school district budgets. It took years for the complaints of U.S. citizens to gain any traction.

There was already an unholy alliance of agribusiness and other employers of unskilled labor and Congressmen. Corporate farmers and other business interests argued that the work performed by illegal aliens was desperately needed. However, several studies, including one conducted by the President’s Commission on Migratory Labor in Texas, demonstrated that if employers paid standard American wages there would be plenty of Americans able and willing to take the jobs. In the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, for example, where tens of thousands of illegal aliens were employed, wages were half that paid in other parts of Texas for the same agricultural jobs. Lyndon Johnson, a Congressman from Texas at the time,

Snip...

It seems that corruption was a fact of life in the Immigration and Naturalization Service and in the Border Patrol. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Eisenhower’s first Attorney General, said that America “was faced with a breakdown in law enforcement on a very large scale. When I say large scale, I mean hundreds of thousands were coming in from Mexico without restraint.” They were also staying here without restraint. Border Patrol agents tell stories of rounding up illegal aliens on large farms, only to have them released after the politically connected employer called the right people.

Once firmly established in the White House, Eisenhower went to work on the problem. Early in 1954, he appointed retired Lt. Gen. Joseph “Jumpin’ Joe” Swing as the new Commissioner of the INS. Eisenhower could not have made a better choice. Handsome and square-jawed with sparkling blue eyes, white hair, and a bearing that suggested strength and decisiveness, the 60-year-old Swing could have come from Central Casting. The New Jersey-born Swing had been a classmate of Eisenhower at West Point, graduating in 1915 as a member of “the class the stars fell on.”

Snip...

Swingin’ for the Border Fence
With such a background, it is not surprising that Swing provided aggressive leadership as Commissioner of the INS, reorganizing the service and appointing fellow retired generals to key posts. Corrupt and powerful Congressmen, such as Senator Lyndon Johnson of Texas who served the interests of corporate agribusiness and had been able to frustrate the efforts of the Border Patrol, now found themselves facing a new kind of Commissioner in Swing. Moreover, Swing had the full support of President Eisenhower. Disregarding political pressure from Johnson and other such Congressmen, Swing quickly formulated a plan for the apprehension and deportation of illegal aliens, naming it Operation ~~~back. On D-day, June 17, 1954, Swing sent 750 of his Border Patrol agents into the field to begin a sweep through Arizona and California. Within a month, Jumpin’ Joe’s boys had taken more than 50,000 illegal aliens into custody — and half a million more, fearing arrest, had self-deported.

Snip...


We got ourselves into this mess and we can get ourselves out of it. However, to do so it will take bold, decisive, and forceful leaders the caliber of Lt. Gen. Joseph Swing — that is if America still produces such men.
— Photo of J.M. Swing: AP Images


The End

I did such a horrible job hacking it up you may of just as well go to the source. Once again;

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index....gal-immigrants
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2010, 11:58 AM
StokeyBob's Avatar
StokeyBob StokeyBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 96
Default

Here is my two-step plan.

We may have to kiss the keisters of the illegal invaders, it is still a felony to aid and abet them.

If some honest men and women in law enforcement, would go after the lowlifes in the government, business, and the general population that have been aiding and abetting them, by the time they had enough of a handle on the job to raise their heads and look around, I don’t think many illegal aliens would still be left.

We don't need any new laws to do this either. Just some honest men and women in law enforcement that take their oaths of office seriously!

Finding them is the first step!



Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(B)(ii)

"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

A smaller percentage of the criminals involved in the tyranny are of Hispanic decent than one would imagine at first glance!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2010, 12:34 PM
Twoller Twoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,296
Default

We can start by upholding our basic laws, but clearly since the basic laws are not being upheld, then some new laws are going to have to be considered. But it depends on what we got already and why that hasn't been working.

The most important change that we need to see is about anchor babies. We need to make it clear that only the offspring of two US citizens qualify as birthright citizens.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2010, 01:24 PM
StokeyBob's Avatar
StokeyBob StokeyBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twoller View Post
We can start by upholding our basic laws, but clearly since the basic laws are not being upheld, then some new laws are going to have to be considered. But it depends on what we got already and why that hasn't been working.

The most important change that we need to see is about anchor babies. We need to make it clear that only the offspring of two US citizens qualify as birthright citizens.
I think we are going to have to be real careful allowing the criminals in the government of both parties to pull us into any debate for new laws. Your birthright area may be safe to consider...but still... like I've said before...

Why would anyone even consider negotiating with anyone that never gets around to keeping their word on any of the immigration laws of the past?

What would be the point?

This is like the people that got caught by their own rules while playing games as children. Every time they would get caught in one of their old rules they would start in on a big speech for a new rule. They never would pay up on being caught on the old rule.

No one plays with them long.

Just what are we still doing dealing with these liars?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2010, 02:50 PM
Twoller Twoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StokeyBob View Post
....

Just what are we still doing dealing with these liars?[/I]
The problem is the "two party system". As long as the public continues to support the notion that government just naturally consists of the "two parties", the Democrats and the Republicans, and that there are no other political interests, we are going to have the same problems.

The backbone of the "two party system" is the primary election system where we hold public elections for the nominees within the two parties. The public is drawn up in these elections and frequently confuses them with the election for the actual office. Our last election here in California was a primary election for the races for the party candidates for governer. The actual election is this November.

The only thing we have to do to get rid of the publicly financed and managed primary elections is to confront the odious practice of asking your political party when you register to vote. Most people who are voting are already registered and don't really think too hard about the fact that they are on file with the government as to their party affiliation. Nobody has any business asking you what your political party is when you register to vote. And nobody has any business keeping track of your political party for purposes of elections. We need to make it a criminal act to ask what your political party is for purposes of voting and voter registration. There are many such criminal acts possible around voting and voter registration.

This will destroy the "two party system". No more Red States. No more Blue States. A whole new order will emerge while the "two parties" scramble to reorient themselves to who their members are and the members themselves are forced to actually think about what it means to be either a Democrat or a Republican.

Has anyone noticed all the media attention given to the marriage of Chelsea Clinton? Since when does the marriage of a daughter of a former president qualify as a media event? It is the cultural advancement of the "two party" order.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved