Gov. Brown’s disgraceful actions hurt Californians

[Yourfired]

Posted: Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:16 am, Sat Oct 15, 2011.

Last weekend, California Gov. Jerry Brown perpetrated his own Saturday Night Massacre. On Oct. 8, Brown signed three bills that make illegal aliens' lives cozier but impose more taxpayer burdens and create more dangers on the state's roads. Had Brown's bills been on a general ballot, all would have been overwhelmingly defeated. Brown's disgrace represents another blow to Californians desperately looking for sanity in Sacramento.

The bills are:

1) California's DREAM Act, A.B. 131, which gives illegal aliens access to Cal Grants, formerly available only to citizens. Despite supporters' claim that the DREAM Act is an investment in California's future, the bill doesn't have a citizenship provision. Non-citizen graduates cannot be legally employed.

2) The second bill, A.B. 1236, bans all public and private employers from using E-Verify, the national online database that allows employers to check their new hires' immigration status. California has a 12.1 percent unemployment rate. E-Verify would assure that only legally authorized individuals have jobs.

3) A.B. 353, the third bill, prohibits police officers from impounding unlicensed drivers' vehicles at checkpoints. A large percentage of such drivers are aliens. According to research conducted by the AAA Foundation and published in its report titled "Unlicensed to Kill," unlicensed drivers are involved in one of every five fatal crashes.

If you wonder how a law as destructive as A.B. 353 could even be considered, here's the tortured logic. Assemblyman Gil Cedillo asserts that aliens (who have no legal right to be in the United States) need their cars to get to work (it's against the law for them to drive or to be employed). Cedillo says the aliens can't afford the fees to get their cars out of impound.

Brown's bills, California Latino Legislative Caucus favorites, are insane. Being a Democrat or having liberal political leanings is one thing. But approving irrational, irresponsible legislation that works against the best interests of the majority is not only hurtful but idiotic.

Backing up, even though Brown won by a large majority, he's the accidental governor. In 1990, California passed a term-limit law restricting governors and other legislators to two-four year terms. Brown, protesting that he first served before the law passed, ignored it. Then, unchallenged on his misinterpretation of the term-limit restriction, Brown became the default Democratic candidate when no other party member could be persuaded to run for the thankless job. Finally, Brown coasted into office when Republican Meg Whitman mounted the most ineffective campaign in recent California political history.

Brown's irresponsible behavior prompted two actions, one of which could end his governorship. On Monday, Assemblyman Tim Donnelly filed documents to initiate a ballot initiative to overturn the law. A website, www.stopab131.com, has been established to help collect the necessary 504,000 signatures within 90 days.

Donnelly noted that California is billions of dollars in the hole, unemployment is 12.1 percent, schools' and teachers' budgets have been ravaged, job centers shut, state parks closed and veterans' reentry services slashed. Yet Brown managed to find a $42 million DREAM Act slush fund for illegal aliens to attend schools whose tuition rates have risen 10 to 12 percent. Colleges are so overcrowded that students participate in a lottery to enroll in the classes they need to graduate.

Even better than voiding Brown's laws is the nascent movement to unseat him. Disgusted Californians have organized a recall campaign that if successful, as it was in 2003 when Gray Davis was ousted, would force a special election. Recall advocates would need to collect approximately 1.2 million signatures, not a daunting task given the rampant statewide discontent. Making the recall easier is that it isn't tied specifically to any of Brown's treasonous bills. Registered voters angry about any issue can sign.

Brown should pack his bags. California, the state that can afford it the least, is the nation's friendliest toward aliens. Davis got the boot for less egregious offenses during better economic times.

Joe Guzzardi was a Democratic candidate in the 2003 Recall Gray Davis election. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.
http://www.lodinews.com/opinion/colu...810d65a87.html

[ilbegone]

Originally Posted by Yourfired

If you wonder how a law as destructive as A.B. 353 could even be considered, here's the tortured logic. Assemblyman Gil Cedillo asserts that aliens (who have no legal right to be in the United States) need their cars to get to work (it's against the law for them to drive or to be employed). Cedillo says the aliens can't afford the fees to get their cars out of impound.

guzzjoe@yahoo.com.
http://www.lodinews.com/opinion/colu...810d65a87.html

And here is why Cedillo takes such a stand: Cedillo is an old school brown racist with a brown racial agenda.

He was born in Barstow, grew up in Los Angeles, and parded up with Villaraigosa in high school.

[Twoller]

This is just hilarious:

....

If you wonder how a law as destructive as A.B. 353 could even be considered, here's the tortured logic. Assemblyman Gil Cedillo asserts that aliens (who have no legal right to be in the United States) need their cars to get to work (it's against the law for them to drive or to be employed). Cedillo says the aliens can't afford the fees to get their cars out of impound.

....

If people are serious about recalling Brown, I'm all for it and will work for it too.

I don't understand why there is an effort to overturn 131 and nothing to overturn 353.

Is that right about 1236? My understanding was that 1236 prevented mandatory use of E-verify. Can the state really ban the use of E-verify? That doesn't sound right. I'm all for mandatory E-verify.

[Ayatollahgondola]

Originally Posted by Twoller

This is just hilarious:



If people are serious about recalling Brown, I'm all for it and will work for it too.

I don't understand why there is an effort to overturn 131 and nothing to overturn 353.

Is that right about 1236? My understanding was that 1236 prevented mandatory use of E-verify. Can the state really ban the use of E-verify? That doesn't sound right. I'm all for mandatory E-verify.

Here are the likely reasons 131 takes center stage on a recall:

131 is a simple idea to grasp. Give illegals free education at the expense of legal citizens. And it aids and abets illegal aliens at taxpayer expense. It also allows our state government to sanction the breaking of federal laws. In addition, 131 has taken the biggest advertisement share, and that is something to be taken advantage of

The everify bills are not that well known. Plus they are complicated. The E-verify bill that Brown signed only prevents cities and counties from mandating E-verify use by their contractors, thus would only affect those municipalities who would be willing to use it. Not that many really. Not yet anyway.

So 131 was the logical, most effective choice to recall.