Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > Priority Topics Section > Candidates 2010

Candidates 2010 Topics and information relating to the Candidates in the 2010 elections.

Immigration Pushed To The Forefront Again.... Thanks! To Everyone Who Has Propelled This Issue To Its' Rightful Position. Years Of Hard Work Are Paying Off.....Keep Up The Good Work!......
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2010, 06:20 AM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 469
Default Meg Whitman

Here's an opportunity to flesh out the candidate Whitman. Aside from the hype, what are the facts? Is she capable of a government job? Will she turn our government into a business? What are her platforms? Can she be trusted with the keys to our state? Who will she appoint? How would a Whitman win affect SOS faithful?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2010, 04:43 PM
DerailAmnesty.com DerailAmnesty.com is offline
"SZinWestLA"
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,003
Default

Completely untrustworthy. Seems to have no problem saying whatever she figures a particular audience wants to hear. A Whitman victory would probably impact California resident SOS members in the same fashion as the election of most Republicans who achieve statewide office in this state - Not a great deal b/c the candidate won't be able to accomplish much w/o whoring out to the Democratic majority in Sacramento.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2010, 04:36 AM
ilbegone's Avatar
ilbegone ilbegone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com View Post
Completely untrustworthy. Seems to have no problem saying whatever she figures a particular audience wants to hear. A Whitman victory would probably impact California resident SOS members in the same fashion as the election of most Republicans who achieve statewide office in this state - Not a great deal b/c the candidate won't be able to accomplish much w/o whoring out to the Democratic majority in Sacramento.
And here's the rub.

I believe Jerry Brown is eminently more qualified for governor than Whitman. But what would happen to California with Brown as governor and that lunatic Democrat majority in Sacramento?

Sad to believe that for me the choice is whether California has a swift or moderate slide into the ocean, and Whitman's best use as a "public servant" is that she will be a dead weight on the backs of embecilic legislators.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern

Hay burros en el maiz

RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART

Don't drink and post.

"A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying

"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra

Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days"

SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2010, 06:43 AM
Patriotic Army Mom Patriotic Army Mom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 829
Default

The choice sucks! Although Brown would get my vote, not that I'm elated about that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2010, 04:52 PM
Eagle1 Eagle1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOTAZTLAN
Posts: 406
Default

Neither of the major parties, Republican or Democratic have come up with anyone that can address the problems facing the state due to their inherent corruption.

Third parties are presently unable to compete with the big two.

Perhaps we need to become part of these two parties and their internal functions in order to effect change representative of the American peoples' wishes. Then again it may have been tried already.

Oh crap we are in such trouble!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2010, 08:45 PM
ilbegone's Avatar
ilbegone ilbegone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle1 View Post

Perhaps we need to become part of these two parties and their internal functions in order to effect change
That is exactly what the brown separatist faction did on the local and regional level with the Democrat party - infiltrate and quietly make their agenda part of the party platform.

Except they came out of the closet in California.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern

Hay burros en el maiz

RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART

Don't drink and post.

"A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying

"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra

Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days"

SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show.


Last edited by ilbegone; 09-13-2010 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2010, 09:28 AM
Twoller Twoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle1 View Post
Neither of the major parties, Republican or Democratic have come up with anyone that can address the problems facing the state due to their inherent corruption.

Third parties are presently unable to compete with the big two.

Perhaps we need to become part of these two parties and their internal functions in order to effect change representative of the American peoples' wishes. Then again it may have been tried already.

Oh crap we are in such trouble!
The answer is to destroy the death grip that the major parties have on government in the "two party system". The way that they monopolize government is by using the government to keep track of what political party registered voters belong to. There are government records of what political party you belong to if you are registered to vote. There is no reason for the government to keep such records except for the purpose of primary elections which are government run elections provided for the political parties to pick their nominees for office.

All that is necessary to destroy the "two party system" is to make it a crime to ask a registering voter what their political party is. This would end the primary election system, and the government records of the party affiliation of voters. These lists are how the "two party system" manages districts and gerrymanders them. Get rid of the lists and the government goes back to confronting issues instead of districts.

That and the lack of term limits is what makes the "two party system" so powerful. Get rid of it and both the Republicans and Democrats will have to go back to being political parties again instead of government.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2010, 04:57 AM
DerailAmnesty.com DerailAmnesty.com is offline
"SZinWestLA"
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,003
Default

Whitman's response to the illegal alien maid debate? Double-down on the Hispandering!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,4952085.story
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2010, 05:39 AM
Rim05 Rim05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: So CA
Posts: 1,222
Default

She got caught with her pants down but with $119 million of her own dollars invested, don't look for her to give up.
I wonder how many of those Americans who are at the meetings, trying to find a way to save their homes from foreclosure would refuse $23 an hour to do what ever is needed, true they need more than a few hours a week but we don't really know how many hours Nicki worked.
Nicki said she was abused and cheated, why did she not report Meg or quit?

HIRE LEGAL AMERICANS and you will not have these problems.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2010, 09:22 AM
Kathy63 Kathy63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 380
Default

I remember what kind of governor Jerry Brown was first time around. It wasn't pretty. He tends to govern not by what's best for the state. The state exists as an extension of his personal view and opinions. He governs by doing what he feels like doing. That's why he appointed the anti death penalty Rose Bird to the Supreme Court and tried to run away when she was impeached.

Brown has shown an unwillingness to enforce laws he tends not to agree with. As attorney general he refused to defend the state when it was sued over Prop 8. Excuse me Mr. Brown, you had a job to do whether or not you agreed with the law as it was constituted. If he's not going to do his job as Attorney General, he's not likely to do his job as governor either. No matter what you vote for, Jerry Brown will ignore the laws in favor of how he feels it should be.

To Jerry Brown the citizens and people of California are dolls in the dollhouse and he's the dollmaker, the puppetmaster. We're all here for his benefit.

As much as I do not like Meg Whitman, she knows what business is like way more than this career politician who thinks he's king and we're all his serfs. He has never done anything in his entire career to benefit California or Californians.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState 2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved