Eleven States Ready To Adopt Arizona Immigration Laws

[Don]

Originally Posted by PochoPatriot

Two questions:
1. How does being supportive of legal immigration destroy an argument against illegal immigration?

2. Where in the quote is a "moral right" to immigration being espoused?

1. The whole distinction between "illegal" and "legal" immigration is a fig leaf behind which people hide in order to minimize their risk of being called racists. If everyone thinks "legal" immigration is ok, why don't you just support amnesty and bingo: Everyone who came here "illegally" will be "legal" and you should have no more problem with them being here.

The bogus talk about "illegal" vs. "legal" immigration is a white flag of surrender. People who hide behind their support for "legal immigration" are invariably the strongest opponents to "amnesty" that would legalize illegal aliens. And with good reason.

Most people don't object to them being here because they're "illegal". Most people object because illegal aliens are third world primitives and savages who are not compatible with advanced modern civilization. You cannot have a first world country with a third world population. Seriously. Do you think these savages would behave any differently if they were legal? I don't.

If you want confirmation of this, read the LA Times Sunday edition 5.23,10, article about the up and coming industry in Los Angeles: An "academy" for certifying "gang interventionists."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...ext-crime.html

Teachers are being laid off, but LA is increasing its budget for an "academy" to give "certification" to "gang interventionists" all of whom are former gang members(!) and whose primary job is to try to talk latino gang bangers out of killing each other. Science, math, history, etc., teachers are being laid off for budgetary reasons, but the city has money for former gang bangers who will enjoy full employment at taxpayer expense. I have never seen anything so stupid.

2. The quote does not use the word "moral right", but that is the underlying premise of people who defend immigration of any sort.