Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > United States Federal government

United States Federal government Topics and information relating to the federal government of interest to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2010, 03:00 PM
rs232c rs232c is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Supporters took solace that the judge kept portions of the law intact, including a section that bars local governments from limiting enforcement of federal immigration laws. Those jurisdictions are commonly known as "sanctuary cities."
If a federal judge knocks down sanctuary cities it is effective at the federal level where no city may create them?

Quote:
"Requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked," Bolton wrote.
Doesn't this say that the federal government's project of fingerprinting prisoners is illegal?

I just read it as I see it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100728/...na_immigration
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2010, 03:42 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

. . .
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."

Last edited by LAPhil; 07-28-2010 at 04:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2010, 05:49 PM
tim55 tim55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 100
Default

Well, I hope Arizona gets a better judge draw in the 9th circuit. Or the supreme court is gonna hear this one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2010, 07:50 PM
DerailAmnesty.com DerailAmnesty.com is offline
"SZinWestLA"
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim55 View Post
Well, I hope Arizona gets a better judge draw in the 9th circuit. Or the supreme court is gonna hear this one.

It's going to go to the Supreme Court, regardless of what the 9th Circuit says.

Folks, this was not as bad as it could have been and, more specifically, the injunction was not as broad/all encompassing as I was expecting.

The provisions left standing:

A. Prohibitions against sanctuary cities. All law enforcement in AZ will have to enforce immigr. laws. No L.A./San Fran/Houston crap can exist.

B. Day laborer aimed restrictions. Penalties/criminal charges for hiring that involves motor vehicles stopping on streets or slowing down traffic goes into effect at midnight.

C. Police have discretionary ability to ask about immigration status (i.e. not mandatory; What do you think is going to be the policy in Maricopa County and around the border?)

Gov. Brewer is right. This one is faaaaaaaaaar from over.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2010, 05:06 AM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com View Post
The provisions left standing:

B. Day laborer aimed restrictions. Penalties/criminal charges for hiring that involves motor vehicles stopping on streets or slowing down traffic goes into effect at midnight.
I heard that day laborers will still be allowed to solicit work.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2010, 07:56 AM
PochoPatriot PochoPatriot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 336
Default

I just heard on Bill Handel's morning show, the president or whatever of some day laborer organization. This person stated that the partial defeat of SB 1070 is not the victory that his side is proclaiming. Rather, he said that the partial defeat of SB 1070 is only going to inflame passions and energize the actions of those for the bill. To which I have one thing to say:

WHAT A KEEN GRASP OF THE OBVIOUS YOU HAVE THERE, SPARKY!
__________________
I think, therefore I love the Dodgers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2010, 09:43 AM
Don Don is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 649
Default

Very good news!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved