Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > California Schools

California Schools Topics And Information Relating To California Schools

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2011, 12:33 PM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default FY2012 Education Budget

FY2012 Education Budget
FY2012 Education Budget
Cost:
$77,400,391,000*
Description: Obama's budget would increase fiscal 2012 discretionary Education Department funding to $77.4 billion, a 10.7% increase from current spending levels and a 20.7% increase from 2010 spending levels. Most of the spending goes to Pell Grants (grants to college students from low income families), Title I grants to disadvantaged schools, and state grants for special education. Republicans have sought to cut Education Department spending from 2010 levels.
Relative Tax Burden: The pie chart highlights the share of total federal income tax paid by each income bracket. For example, taxpayers earning $55,000 pay 18% of the all taxes collected.
http://www.foxnews.com/topics/fy2012...ion-budget.htm
Taxpayer Calculator: Education Spending in Obama's 2012 Budget
By most measures, America's education system ranks among the best. Our classrooms, computer labs, athletic fields and 'enrichment programs' for under-achieving and special education students are the envy of the world.
In fact, the U.S. spends more on education than defense. On a per pupil basis, we rank only behind Switzerland and Norway.
And that's not likely to change under President Obama. His 2012 budget increases federal education spending by 21 percent to $77 billion dollars.
Yet critics say that's a mistake, since there is no link between spending and student performance.
"There really is no correlation between spending per pupil and achievement per pupil," argues Neal McClusky with the Cato Institute Center for Educational Freedom. "Both parties have done this for many decades - they talk about spending money on schools as if that is synonymous with actually educating people but it isn't. What we've seen that money go to is just bigger and bigger staff, better paid teachers or other employees but nothing in terms of outcomes."
Since 1985, federal education spending tripled, yet studies by the National Assessment of Educational Progress show reading, math and science scores remained flat. Internationally, our 8th graders rank 14th in reading, 17th in science and 25th in math. Almost 30 percent of our teenagers don't finish high school, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, and half who enter college drop out, even though per pupil spending nationally averages more than $10,000 a year. America has fallen to 9th in the proportion of young people with a college degree.
Despite those numbers, most educators say American schools are under-funded.
"American students right now are getting less, not more, at a time when President Obama has said we have this race to the future -- that we need to invest more in public education," says John Rogers with the UCLA Graduate School of Education. "I think we need to invest in public education in ways that are wise. President Obama talked about the importance of teachers and he talked about the need to bring new teachers into science and technology, engineering and math."
Historically, school funding was a local responsibility. States got increasingly involved in the 1960's during racial desegregation to smooth out differences between districts. Since 1970, every year the federal government has gotten more involved, from a financial and regulatory point of view.
Many conservatives would eliminate the federal Department of Education, but politically that's unrealistic. Even a minor cut this year by the GOP - $11 billion or 16 percent from the current $72 billion budget, failed. Given the desire of this and future presidents to please voters, most doubt Washington will ever actually reduce federal aid to education, even though there is little or no evidence its money improves student achievement.

Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/20...#ixzz1JFIxedTP

Last edited by Jeanfromfillmore; 04-11-2011 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved