Like any "conspiracy theory", there is an orthodox version and the more serious version which the orthodoxy ignores. Which does Chelene prescribe to, the orthodox versions or the more serious versions? 9/11, for example. Was that anything but an Al Qaeda conspiracy, according to Chelene? I wouldn't trust anyone to any government position who couldn't come to terms with that. If one wanted to confront the complexities of Al Qaeda itself, that might be acceptable in theorizing over conspiracies around 9/11, but nothing short of that for me.
But "chemtrails" was a new one for me. Here is Wikipedia's entry on the subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtra...spiracy_theory
09-19-2010, 11:35 AM
Hybrid Mode
