Federal judge questions immigration prosecutions

[Twoller]

The judge's whole argument rests on what he means by "significant criminal history". His argument falls apart as soon as he is confronted by exactly what he means by "significant criminal history".

What does the judge mean when he says "significant criminal history"?

It is not just bogging down the courts that represents the strategy of illegals and their supporters. It is also the simple overwhelming presence. It is the every day display that is supposed make citizens numb to the whole problem. And since you can't determine just by looking whether the little rat is a an illegal or not, the lax legal immigration policies just make the situation look harder to deal with than it really is.

The courts are the last place where the whole thing bogs down. The streets and every day life is where the errosion is the most apparent.

The courts will bog down under enforcement until increasing the criminality of illegal immigration has the effect of detering illegal immigration before they come, which would be the whole point. Purging our country of illegal immigrants starts by an momentary flooding of the courts. Once our will is represented in the courts and law enforcement, potential illegals will become intimidated where intimidation works the best, on the other side of the border.