SOS has on-again, off-again history

[DerailAmnesty.com]

Here is what I'm sure is a pretty dumb question:

Is Jonathon Randles that thin white kid with the bushy eyebrows who looks like he's about 16 years old and stepped right off the canvas of a Norman Rockwell painting on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post?

[Rim05]

Do you want to bring this up out here?

Good question. I try to never ask a questions just because we have so many 'guests'.

[Eagle1]

Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com

Here is what I'm sure is a pretty dumb question:

Is Jonathon Randles that thin white kid with the bushy eyebrows who looks like he's about 16 years old and stepped right off the canvas of a Norman Rockwell painting on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post?

Yes, that most definitely is him.

[DerailAmnesty.com]

Originally Posted by Eagle1

Yes, that most definitely is him.

OK, so this is the guy some people here want to have hung, drawn and quartered (not literally, of course)?

I really haven't been reading the Signal's articles, until today. I assumed it was him b/c he's the person representing SC's local paper who always seems to be around when we put in appearances.

We spoke briefly at the beginning of the rally yesterday, while I was at the edge of the sidewalk waving my sign around. He was very pleasant and seemed to know who I am. We only exchanged a few pleasantries.

Well, based upon what he's writing, I assume at least one of two things must be true:

A. His political views are not ours and he is deeply offended by and/or concerned about the message we are conveying in his neck of the woods.

B. The topic of white supremacy/racism sells papers.

It's just sort of hard to believe anyone still buys those IndyMedia-caliber accusations at this junction in time.

Which of our white separatist speakers yesterday was supposed to be the head Klansman anyway? You, Moreno, Raheem or Herrera?

[admin]

I don't think the article was overly critical; At least by the standards we've all become accustomed to anyway.

[Jeanfromfillmore]

Originally Posted by admin

I don't think the article was overly critical; At least by the standards we've all become accustomed to anyway.

I agree with you.

[DerailAmnesty.com]

Originally Posted by admin

I don't think the article was overly critical; At least by the standards we've all become accustomed to anyway.

I agree. I was looking at the articles about us, that appeared in yesterday's Signal in totality, however. There is a large, and in my opinion (b/c I know SOS and the people with whom I repeatedly rally) pointless emphasis on racism and white supremacy.

[admin]

Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com

I agree. I was looking at the articles about us, that appeared in yesterday's Signal in totality, however. There is a large, and in my opinion (b/c I know SOS and the people with whom I repeatedly rally) pointless emphasis on racism and white supremacy.

It's not pointless to the media. Racism is their only reliable tool. They have to keep it maintained.

[PochoPatriot]

Originally Posted by admin

It's not pointless to the media. Racism is their only reliable tool. They have to keep it maintained.

Any time the left uses "the race card" it is a clue to the fact that they have no logical answer to our points. It is an ad hominem. That being said, we must understand that racism does exist in some Americans, regardless of skin color, and we must stand against it whenever and wherever it appears. We must stand against those that constantly use race as a wedge to divide, even within our own community.

[Supermanglide]

I don't think the write-up was overly critical; a minimum amount of from the needs we've all turn into accustomed to anyway.