Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > Elections, Politics, and Partisanship

Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2009, 03:50 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default Considering Tom Campbell for Governor

I know a lot of you are still under the impression that there is no clear choice between Republicans and Democrats anymore and you probably think that applies to the 2010 California gubernatorial election as well. Well unless you support Chelene Nightingale which I don't think many of you do, there still is a choice. I have been following Tom Campbell, one of the Republican candidates, for some time now. Tom has been a U.S. congressman from the San Jose area, has a Ph.D in economics, and has been a professor at the University of Chicago. I have read his website, have posted on his blogs, and have spoken to him on a telephone town hall meeting about his views on illegal immigration and amnesty. In the telephone town meeting I asked him to reiterate his positions on the immigration issues, and he stated that his is no way in favor of amnesty, wants to fine employers who hires illegals, and would build a wall along the border of California and Mexico.

I'm going to share this e-mail which I received from Tom today, since I think most of you would get behind him if you knew where he stood. You can also go to his web site at www.campbell.org for more information about his positions on illegal immigration and other issues:


Dear Phil,

Our campaign will be making some news today, and I wanted you to be the first to know.

Thanks to your generosity and support, Campbell for California has crossed the $1 million milestone in funds raised. This is well ahead of schedule, and was made possible by a near doubling in our total amount raised since June 30th, putting us on track for the June 2010 primary.

Though our opponents are likely to pour in as much as $200 million of their own personal fortunes -- an unprecedented sum in American politics -- our total is on pace with what previous nominees for Governor raised the year before the election when they faced self-financed opponents.

I don't need to spend dollar-for-dollar what my opponents will, but I do need enough to get my message out. If the people of California will provide me with the resources sufficient to do so, I will work everyday to more than make up for any remaining financial deficit by providing the strongest vision for the future our state, grounded in specifics and experience.

If you will make that commitment with me, please donate today to launch us into this new phase of the campaign.

Just think of how far we've come. We are competitive in the polls despite being outspent by as much as 100-to-1. We have the most specific plans to deal with the serious challenges facing our state, from the budget to water to fundamental tax reform. Yesterday's news that the state will face a further $21 billion deficit confirms that the next Governor will inherit a financial crisis that can't be wished away by vague generalities.

I am humbled by the growing number of Californians expressing their confidence in my approach and in our ability to win in both June and November.

If we are going to win, I need you to not just donate, but pick up the phone, or send an email, and share this news of our momentum with anyone concerned about the direction of our state. I can't emphasize enough how important email contact is, when sent from a friend to a friend.

Let this be a contest decided on the merits, not on money. Reaching the $1 million mark shows our strong potential to compete in the months ahead, but it's just the start. Can you help keep the momentum of the last few weeks going strong?

With kind regards,
Tom

P.S. As an example of how we're putting your contributions to good use, I'd like to invite you to join me on a telephone town hall forum this evening at 7:45 p.m. PT. Please call 877-269-7289 and use the code 14990. Thank you.







Paid for by Campbell for Governor 2010 Exploratory Committee, Inc.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."

Last edited by LAPhil; 11-19-2009 at 03:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:00 PM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

Is the point getting across?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:06 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore View Post
We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

We are a non profit 501C3 and are barred from supporting any political campaign, party or person for political office.

Is the point getting across?
Jean, I wasn't calling for an endorsement from the organization. I was merely promoting my own position and encouraging others to follow my lead. Is that not permitted? There's no need to be nasty.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."

Last edited by LAPhil; 11-19-2009 at 04:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2009, 04:49 PM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAPhil View Post
Jean, I wasn't calling for an endorsement from the organization. I was merely promoting my own position and encouraging others to follow my lead. Is that not permitted? There's no need to be nasty.
Phil did that come across as being nasty? I thought I was being assertive. What we don't want is this board to become a political battle field of endorsements. That is what happened at the old SOS and we all know how that landed up. But first and foremost we are a nonprofit 501C3. We can not endorse any candidate. We can discuss their issues and such, but not endorse them. When I say we I'm speaking of management. We haven't had elections and placed anyone in position yet. I'm just trying to get that across before the discussions become battles, as you've seen happen before. Politics took over practically the whole board and discussion. You just happen to be one of the first to come forward.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2009, 05:15 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore View Post
Phil did that come across as being nasty? I thought I was being assertive. What we don't want is this board to become a political battle field of endorsements. That is what happened at the old SOS and we all know how that landed up. But first and foremost we are a nonprofit 501C3. We can not endorse any candidate. We can discuss their issues and such, but not endorse them. When I say we I'm speaking of management. We haven't had elections and placed anyone in position yet. I'm just trying to get that across before the discussions become battles, as you've seen happen before. Politics took over practically the whole board and discussion. You just happen to be one of the first to come forward.
I understand that. I'm just trying to get people to pay attention to Campbell because at this point his candidacy is not all that well-known and I'm trying to spread the word about him. Wouldn't you do the same thing if you knew of a really good anti-illegal immigration candidate who had a chance of becoming the next governor, especially given the other choices we have?
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2009, 05:22 PM
DerailAmnesty.com DerailAmnesty.com is offline
"SZinWestLA"
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,003
Default

The best thing about Tom Campbell is that he's the most solid on the immigration issue of any of the gubernatorial candidates who have a chance of winning. The worst thing about Tom Campbell is that his website makes very clear that he considers legal residency appopriate for illegal aliens who were brought here as minors.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2009, 05:45 PM
Eagle1 Eagle1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NOTAZTLAN
Posts: 406
Default

Are we allowed to post a comparison of gubernatorial candidates showing how they stand on the issues, what their background and experience is and such as long as there is not an attempt to show a bias towards any one of them?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2009, 05:49 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 469
Default

Moving this thread to politics, as it is not an "associates in action" related.

You may compare candidates and offer opinions, but not use this forum to encourage others to vote for any certain candidate here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2009, 05:51 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com View Post
The best thing about Tom Campbell is that he's the most solid on the immigration issue of any of the gubernatorial candidates who have a chance of winning. The worst thing about Tom Campbell is that his website makes very clear that he considers legal residency appopriate for illegal aliens who were brought here as minors.
I'll try to ask him about that tonight. He may have an alternate plan for those in that category other than automatic citizenship or a position which would be contingent on the age at which they were brought over.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2009, 06:00 PM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by admin View Post
Moving this thread to politics, as it is not an "associates in action" related.

You may compare candidates and offer opinions, but not use this forum to encourage others to vote for any certain candidate here.
Gotcha, AG. There are so many forums now that sometimes I just can't figure out which one is most appropriate. And I won't push any candidate from now on, but I will offer my point of view.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved