Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > Priority Topics Section > Immigration

Immigration Topics relating to the subject of US Immigration

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2010, 04:15 PM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default Kansas City attorney offers free legal defense for Nebraska town with fresh immigrati

Kansas City attorney offers free legal defense for Nebraska town with fresh immigration ordinance
Kris Kobach, the law professor active in Farmers Branch, has offered his legal defense skills for free in Fremont, Nebraska, where an anti-illegal immigration ordinance just passed.

The offer is an unusual one because his fees are usually paid by governments, he says in a story in the Fremont Tribune. That ordinance won voter approval this Monday by a large margin. And it follows the April inking of a much more broadly focused law in the state of Arizona.

Kobach is on the faculty of the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and senior counsel for the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which is the legal affiliate of the D.C.-based Federation for American Immigration Reform, an advocacy group for greater restrictions on legal and illegal immigration.

The city of Fremont hasn't accepted Kobach's offer and the city attorney says the city's insurance provider will decide who represents Fremont if it's sued.

City attorney Dean Skokan had this to say today in the Fremont Tribune:
"I did receive a communication from Kobach, I first saw it this morning, offering to provide representation to the city under certain conditions," Skokan said Wednesday. "I have forwarded that to LARM, who is making the arrangements for our defense, and I assume they will act accordingly."

Skokan said LARM will probably use the Lincoln firm of Harding and Shultz.
The city of Fremont is small (pop. 24,635) with a foreign-born population of 4.4 percent, but the ordinance is noteworthy for its partial emphasis on businesses who hire illegal immigrants.
Ordinances and laws with such a component have survived judicial review more frequently, notes Mike Hethmon, the general counsel of the Immigration Reform Law Institute. And Hethmon said that his associate Kobach is authorized to practice law in Nebraska.

The most significant of the immigration and business measures is probably the 2007 law passed in Arizona that allows business licenses to be suspended or even yanked for those employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. It also requires mandatory use of the federal government's E-Verify system to check valid Social Security numbers.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, known for more liberal rulings, upheld the Arizona law. But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and others, appealed it on behalf of the business community. The U.S. Supreme Court could decide to take up the issue soon.
The Fremont ordinance also addresses rentals--the sole focus of the Farmers Branch ordinance now stymied by a federal court ruling.
http://farmersbranchblog.dallasnews....nce-crack.html
Legal Architect Behind Arizona Law Becomes Sought-After Immigration Guru
Illegal immigration crackdowns popping up across the country have a common thread: a 44-year-old constitutional law professor and former Bush administration attorney who crafted the legal framework behind Arizona's controversial immigration law.
Kris Kobach has become a sought-after figure for states and cities looking to replicate tough immigration statutes similar to Arizona's new law, which gives unprecedented power to local police in questioning and detaining individuals they suspect are in the country illegally.
Kobach was the legal architect behind Arizona's SB 1070, which is being challenged by the Obama administration. With that combination of cachet and infamy, he's become the go-to guy for crafters of copycat laws, and he is putting his mark on legislation across the country, most recently in Fremont, Neb.
"I've been in touch with state representatives in Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, Alabama and Idaho," Kobach said in an interview with FoxNews.com.
Kobach, of Kansas City, Mo., has paved a formidable path for himself in legal and political circles, positioning himself as a rising star within the Republican Party. He has at the same time attracted a host of critics, from lawmakers to civil libertarians who say his work promotes racial profiling.
Kobach's crusade against illegal immigration began when he was working for the Justice Department under Attorney General John Ashcroft in the days following the Sept. 11 attacks. Kobach helped create the "National Security Entry-Exit Registration System," which required immigration officials to fingerprint and question more than 80,000 male visitors, most of whom were from Muslim countries. None was ever charged with terrorist activity, however, and the program was eventually cancelled.
After leaving the White House in 2003, the Harvard and Yale-educated attorney went on to assist local governments around the country on various immigration statutes, taking him from Hazleton, Pa., to Valley Park, Mo., to Farmers Branch, Texas.
But perhaps in no other place is his legal influence greater than in Arizona.
In 2006, Kobach successfully defended an Arizona law that made immigrant smuggling a state crime. In 2007, Arizona State Sen. Russell Pearce, the author of SB 1070, contacted him for assistance in drafting the Legal Arizona Workers Act, which ensures that no business in Arizona knowingly hires or employs illegal immigrants. His legal triumphs in defending the two statutes led to state officials recruiting his help in crafting SB 1070.
Aside from his legislative work, Kobach has also represented U.S. citizens as plaintiffs trying to prevent states from giving in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants.
Kobach has most recently come under fire for his role in drafting an ordinance in Fremont, Neb., that implements a ban on hiring or renting property to illegal immigrants. The measure, which passed Monday, sparked an outcry from local activists who say it has fueled anti-immigrant sentiments in a city that has only 1,995 Hispanics.
"He has used our community for his own legal career and has peddled a failed idea of local enforcement of immigration laws," said Kristin Ostrom, a local activist lobbying to overturn the ban.
Kobach is "whipping up a sentiment of fear of Hispanics and using the ruse of illegal immigration for his own agenda," Ostrom said, adding that "the outcome of his work is a Hispanic community that does not feel welcome in Fremont."
Critics have also pointed to Kobach's past work with the Federation for American Immigration Reform -- or FAIR -- a group perceived by some as extremist.
Of the backlash of criticism over Arizona's immigration law, Kobach said it's politics -- not issues over its legality -- that are leading the charges against it.
"I think the Obama administration's reaction has been very surprising," Kobach said of the pushback. "They sent the U.S. Attorney General out to comment on the law before he even read it, which was a big mistake and an irresponsible move on behalf of the administration."
The White House confirmed last week that it plans to challenge Arizona's law in court, arguing both that it will lead to racial profiling and that it's the federal government's responsibility to regulate immigration.
Critics, including the administration, have specifically pointed to language within SB 1070 that gives local law enforcement the right to detain individuals based on "reasonable suspicion" that they are in the U.S. illegally. Opponents argue that such a phrase is not clearly defined and will undoubtedly lead to racial profiling.
Not so, counters Kobach, who says "reasonable suspicion" has been "defined or applied more than 800 times by the federal courts."
"That's a frequently used phrase," he said.
A professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School, Kobach announced in May 2009 his intent to run for Kansas secretary of state, facing off against two Republicans. He summed up his ambition in such a position very simply: to "make a similar impact in stopping voter fraud as I have with illegal immigration."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...a-law-sought-i mmigration-guru/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved