Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > Elections, Politics, and Partisanship

Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2010, 11:52 AM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twoller View Post
That is a direct quote from the above link.

"In the Quinnipiac poll, there was a narrow margin among respondents, 35-37 percent on whether the United States would have been better off had Obama's Republican opponent John McCain won last year's election."

What do those numbers mean, "35-37 percent"? A narrow margin? I don't understand what they are talking about.
Twoller, I think she meant 35% agreed with the statement and 37% disagreed. I saw this poll on the news also and the figures are the same as the way in which it was reported.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2010, 12:22 PM
Twoller Twoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAPhil View Post
Twoller, I think she meant 35% agreed with the statement and 37% disagreed. I saw this poll on the news also and the figures are the same as the way in which it was reported.
Thanks for that information.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:11 PM
Ole Glory's Avatar
Ole Glory Ole Glory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: El Norte de Tijuana
Posts: 537
Default

This just e-mailed to me.

According to the Secretary of State and FPPC, she meets ALL requirements.

Please, do not forward false information, as libel is still grounds for litigation today, even amongst certain individuals running for office. Malicious intent is all that is needed in many circumstances.

Please visit the Secretary of State website to learn further requirements necessary to run for statewide political office.

www.sos.ca.gov

Thank you.

Respectfully yours,

John M. Baldwin

Campaign Manager

Chelene Nightingale for

Governor 2010
__________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it's the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:05 PM
Kathy63 Kathy63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 380
Default

Libel? Excuse me?

The act of libel, according to the law, has to be in written or visual form such as an article or photograph and has to somehow damage the reputation of a person or business in some way where the courts are the natural place to resolve the claims.

I don't see anything defamatory yet. Not even saying that for some reason Chelene failed to qualify for the ballot is defamatory! Her reputation isn't harmed at all.

Since Chelene Nightengale voluntarily injected herself into the public arena, she is now a public figure with a much higher threshold to reach libel. I would say everything so far has been "fair comment".

If what's happened so far has gotten irritating Chelene has proved herself to be nothing more than a political lightweight who can't take it.

As a comparison.

Try what's been said about Arnold Schwarzeneggar, Sarah Palin, George Bush and any number of others. Get out the Truth Squads! It's gonna be a bumpy ride for someone.

Last edited by Kathy63; 01-14-2010 at 03:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2010, 07:06 PM
Borderwatch Borderwatch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 375
Default Rec'd Via Email

Rec'd Via Email

Hi,
here's a laugh and John Baldwin's photo too.
I had to share this because Mr. Baldwin credentials are laughable.
He's not out of college yet. 2010 ???
Enjoy the ride...PLEASE be sitting down when reading this...
I guess Chelene loves her very young campaign managers...LOL

-
FROM HIS FACEBOOK PAGE....John Baldwin
Basic Information
Sex: Male
Birthday: July 16, 1981
Looking For: Networking
Political Views:Constitution Party
Contact Information Website: http://www.nightingaleforgovernor.com
Education and Work College: CSU San Bernardino '10 BS,
Political Science, Public Administration
High School: Jefferson High School '00

Employer: Chelene Nightingale for CA Governor 2010
Position: Campaign Manager
Time Period: August 2009 - Present
Location: Fontana, CA
Description: CAMPAIGN MANAGER:
- Coordinate daily operations.
- Manage campaign funds.
- Secure key endorsements.
- Responsible for seeking advertising and campaign materials.
- Fulfill candidate/campaign requests.
- Work closely with candidate.
- Help oversee campaign team.

Vounteer Coordinator:
- Generate multiple networks of volunteers that assist this organization with respects to running a versatile and comprehensive campaign effort.
- Track and maintain numerous support contacts utilizing Microsoft Outlook and various Windows/OS operating software.
- Implement and coordinate volunteer activities with respects to campaign events.
- Identify and support areas that enhance further growth of volunteer recruitment.
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:44 PM
Subject: Fw: Chelene Nightingale

I cannot concur with your legal decision.
Are you licensed to practice law?
BTW...what was the decision with KING v. ROBINSON, Case Number FSC033119, in the Superior Court of California, County of Solano? I know it effects the AIP in 2010 election and Ms. Nightengale.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-14-2010, 07:14 PM
Jeanfromfillmore's Avatar
Jeanfromfillmore Jeanfromfillmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,287
Default

You guys are just too good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-14-2010, 07:20 PM
DerailAmnesty.com DerailAmnesty.com is offline
"SZinWestLA"
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,003
Default

I don't think I've ever seen anyone as quite as needy of attention as Chelene Nightingale.

Last edited by DerailAmnesty.com; 01-14-2010 at 07:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:29 AM
Ayatollahgondola's Avatar
Ayatollahgondola Ayatollahgondola is offline
SOS Associate
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,057
Default AIP Committee Votes To Exclude Non Party Members From Primary

This is going to be interesting:

http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/01...aip-primaries/

Quote:
On January 13, the state central committee of the American Independent Party (Keyes faction) held a conference call meeting, and voted overwhelmingly to tell the California Secretary of State that the party no longer wishes independents to vote in its primaries for public office. Attendance was 27 people. California election law lets each party decide for itself whether to let independents vote in its primaries for public office. The AIP had been the only ballot-qualified party, other than the Democratic and Republican Parties, to let independents vote in any of its primaries for public office.
The commentary below is also interesting
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved