Obama is ------!

[ilbegone]

Of course it is absurd, but we can't change the absurd in other people.

And no matter how much white blood Obama has, he will be black, no matter much white blood Jose Angel Gutierrez has he will be brown, and regardless of how brown my significant other is, I will always be white.

Who cares.

Let the racist bean counters count their racial beans, and let us do what we need to do.

The other side has race covered - there's no way to win trotting out race.

Let it go.

[Rim05]

Post # 1 post sounds like some one who is on some strange concoction, or worse.
Who spends that much time and forum space, defining WHO a person is? How about just let a person be a human. My own thought is you wasted a lot of time and shown just how race concerned you are.
Get a life!

[Ayatollahgondola]

Originally Posted by Rim05

Post # 1 post sounds like some one who is on some strange concoction, or worse.
Who spends that much time and forum space, defining WHO a person is? How about just let a person be a human. My own thought is you wasted a lot of time and shown just how race concerned you are.
Get a life!

I'm not sure his post was intended as pointing out any race fixations of his own, as much as it was those of the voters/pundits/media. They do refer to him as black for the most part, giving rise to some un-stated rule that those genes are the dominant ones when calculated for political purposes. Obama stated in the past he refers to himself as a "mutt", but most of his supporters feel otherwise obviously.

Maybe it would help if we chose our candidates for office the same way the contestants were chosen on the Dating Game, that daytime TV show where one girl chose from three bachelors hidden from view. The voice, the answers they gave, and the basic history the emcee read would be the only contact allowed for the voters. Gotta wonder if Obama would have been selected with rules like that last election

[wetibbe]

I learned a long time ago that responding to detractors is really a bad thing to do. Further it is very bad form to defy those that have the powers to pull the cork and ban. I have been banned from MANY websites over the years.

As to the apparent posting of the N word which enforcement found so offensive, sorry but Kat Willams and his minions find it hysterically comically and acceptable. Then why can I ask it is so psychologically amusing to black but so horrifying as to send enforcers into a tizzy of shock and horror !?????

As to RIMO5 he/she is entitled to an opinion. not a problem for me. I just can't process the complaint in view of his inability to understand my posts.

As a guest I want to abide by all rules and apologize disingenuously for infractions that are convoluted and clearly above the mental capacity to understand.

[The Enforcer]

Originally Posted by wetibbe

I learned a long time ago that responding to detractors is really a bad thing to do. Further it is very bad form to defy those that have the powers to pull the cork and ban. I have been banned from MANY websites over the years.

As to the apparent posting of the N word which enforcement found so offensive, sorry but Kat Willams and his minions find it hysterically comically and acceptable. Then why can I ask it is so psychologically amusing to black but so horrifying as to send enforcers into a tizzy of shock and horror !?????

As to RIMO5 he/she is entitled to an opinion. not a problem for me. I just can't process the complaint in view of his inability to understand my posts.

As a guest I want to abide by all rules and apologize disingenuously for infractions that are convoluted and clearly above the mental capacity to understand.

Since the re-organization 3 years ago, no one has been banned from this organization with the exception of those spam advertisers that register and then use the forum for ad purposes only. We don't use that option unless it is a last resort, not a first, second, or even third. We would restrict a poster as a third resort.

The word in question is only appropriate when used in the quotational sense, and only when other forms of referencing have been exhausted or deemed insufficient to convey the gravity of the concept being expressed, and where the reference itself under those guidelines is applicable or unavoidable when conveying a necessary component of our agenda. We are not a raunchy, low talent, comedy venue where those catering to the lowest common denominator of human condition seek economic gain, or notariety. The harm in the sense it was being used, for political expression, far outweighed any useful component to the furtherance of our agenda.