|
Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The question I would ask her is why would she assume all this when there's no logical reason to suspect anything sinister going on. It just seems completely out of left field.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY Ich Bin Ein Arizonan! "I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin." Last edited by LAPhil; 10-28-2010 at 08:58 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you listen to what she says, it becomes obvious into what "books" she keeps her nose poked.
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I thought I already captured the worst photo of Chelene, but now here's one that may be a top competitor. Almost looks Halloween-esque
aip3 by Nightingale For Governor, on Flickr |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chelene's usually pretty photogenic. Besides, she'll get a lot more opportunities in front of the camera after she wins the gubernatorial election tomorrow.
------------ NIGHTINGALE HISTORIAN NEEDED OK, I heard an interview of Chelene on Public Radio and this portion of an answer she gave stuck out - at least to me. The reason it caught my attention was I have had two separate conversations in the past couple months, with two separate SoCal activists well known to most of us, in two separate counties at different events. Both people said the same thing to me. Specifically, they were convinced Chelene would change her position on illegal immigration in a second if she thought it would benefit her in some fashion. For my part, I can't recall ever hearing Chelene flip-flop or "wander" on the issue. However, Chelene and I were never close friends and never spoke at length. Therefore, I don't know if this portion of a meandering answer she gave to an inquiry on radio, is actually inconsistent with anything she's ever said previously. If someone knows if this differs from what she's said in the past, please chime in. I also do support, just so you know, an agricultural work program, I think that's a must and those families should be staying here. Um, but, y'know, this, this issue is complicated because we've allowed the government to open up the doors basically. I, I don't see where, I, I just want to make this clear too, I don't support deportation at all. I think that's very inhumane.
__________________
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY Ich Bin Ein Arizonan! "I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Can it be that the girl is morphing into a full fledged politician? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Pedictably, Chelene did horribly. She didn't even make the 2% level. a few of the counties she pulled a little better when taken individually, but since this was a statewide race, those don't matter when diluted by the greater mass.
I was reading how the press treated O'Donnel after the defeat, and she pretty much mirrors Chelene in history and temperment. Both had no experience, no real education, and both lied about their credentials. Both lost their homes prior to the race, and both had debts owed to supporters and others before their run. The similarities don't end there, but O'donnel probably cost the republicans that possibly pivotal seat, whereas Chelene didn't even come close to mattering. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Oh yes. It was me. Christine O'Donnell did better because she did have a history and served in the state assembly before making her senate run. She didn't enter the race because some ego bump needed massaging. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
2nd half of the interview: http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk...e-nightingale/ I genuinely don't know if her remarks (in the entry above) are at odds with what she's said previously. It's just that, when I heard it, it sounded like she was trying to "massage" the answer or "take the edge off" her position. After listening to her unsuccessfully try to finesse the birther question John & Ken threw at her, at the end of the interview she had on KFI, it occurred to me that it's possible she considers this a more palatable position after having invested so much time in the Central Valley, where lots of supporters must have spoken to her about their agricultural concerns. Again, guess work on my part. I've never spoken to Chelene at length about anything, let alone her ideas about deportation and guest worker programs.
__________________
|
|
|