Quote:
Originally Posted by Don
I think you should all write to the family of the rancher who was murdered by these vermin in Arizona and remind them not to over react and to keep in mind that not "all" Mexicans are bad people. I'm sure they will appreciate your concern that they not have racist thoughts.
The measures I propose, exterminating these vermin if they are in our country, are no different than carried out by Churchill and FDR against defenseless Germans and Japanese civilians who were no threat to us. They're far more moderate than the systematic poisoning of Iraq with radioactive munitions today. Mexican scum are invading our country and killing our people and they deserve the same fate as people on the other side of the world who never did anything to us.
When bloody massacres begin and you see these vermin and their mobs burning and looting American cities and pulling Americans out of cars you will quickly forget your fear of being called a "racist" by the SPLC and accept the fact that we are in a struggle for physical survival.
In the aftermath of the Mexican war in 1848, there was some sentiment favoring annexation of Mexico. Sen. John C. Calhoun opposed the annexation of Mexico arguing that their association would destroy America. He could not have been more right. History has proven him correct, as anyone can see by just driving through metropolitan Southern California and seeing how Mexicans have transformed America into filthy stinking Mexican slums, bankrupted hospitals and destroyed schools.
They are fully up to the task of exterminating us and have openly announced that intention. Anyone who shrinks from that reality is doomed.
|
First of all Don, you keep bring up the specter of race, when invasion by a foriegn country is not necessarily attached to that...as in your example of Germany. Since we are not an organization based upon racial agendas, how about just leaving that out of mix for now.
Secondly, mainstream immigration and border enforcement proponents are not very eager to embrace methods or even proposals that associate themselves with bombing, mayhem, slaughter, or similar things and give rise to the accusation that they are just all wild, foaming at the mouth extremists. The more exteme the measures proposed, the less support and following those associated with it seem to have in terms of numbers...probably financially too. The conditions that you mentioned have not happened in America as of yet, and therefore have not inspired or driven the affected population to engage or even support such measures currently. Maybe they never will, but who knows. In the interim, you are placing yourself in very slim cross section of the movement, and will more than likely be ostracized by them at the rate your headed. Now I am not devoid of sympthy for victims of mexican crime. I am actually quite predisposed to vengance, retaliation, and holding a grudge....I'm not afraid to admit that. But I also concern myself with how the general population and my peers percieve my actions, intentions, and statements. After all, they are the ones who will judge me here on earth. So I do temper my attitude, at least the public one, so that I don't alienate myself to the point nobody even listens to what I have to say anymore, even when it is the truth. Now maybe you are a seer or way ahead of the rest of us with your predictions and suggestions, but that's usually a problem.
It's like feeding people undercooked meat, unripe fruit, or raw unprocessed olives: expect them to spit it out while making distorted faces.