Quote:
Originally Posted by Twoller
The judge's whole argument rests on what he means by "significant criminal history". His argument falls apart as soon as he is confronted by exactly what he means by "significant criminal history".
|
The judge should not be setting policy for the prosecution. How can a judge remain impartial under circumstances like those. A judge is supposed to decide the cases on merits of points of law. congress makes law, and the president signs them. I don't see anywhere where the prosecution brought a case based upon any point of law that would have caused a judge to toss it out as in the case of malicious prosecution or anything.