View Single Post
  #4  
Old 01-24-2010, 04:59 AM
ilbegone's Avatar
ilbegone ilbegone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,068
Default

Here is the key statement:

Quote:
Both Mr. Heller and Mr. Velasquez declined to say how many of the 12 listed plaintiffs are considered illegal immigrants.
When it serves the purposes of the open borders crowd, the concept of nationality is blurred by race.

However, when it's time to bash enforcement of immigration law, they would complain about "profiling".

It fairly slaps me in the face as to who is likely to be illegal and who is likely to be a citizen. There is generally a world of difference between foreign nationals and their American born children. What this article doesn't say is what are the plaintiffs doing that sets off those indicators?

One of the things I find quite disingenuous is when they yell about racial profiling and racial discrimination when the immigration officers are Hispanic and grew up in the culture.

One would certainly think they would have a good idea of who is who.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern

Hay burros en el maiz

RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART

Don't drink and post.

"A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying

"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra

Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days"

SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show.

Reply With Quote