Save Our State

Save Our State (http://www.saveourstate.info/index.php)
-   Elections, Politics, and Partisanship (http://www.saveourstate.info/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Perry booed on (illegal) immigration at GOP debate (http://www.saveourstate.info/showthread.php?t=4530)

Borderwatch 09-22-2011 07:16 PM

Perry booed on (illegal) immigration at GOP debate
 
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...-at-gop-debate


Texas Gov. Rick Perry was booed by the Republican audience after he discussed his rationale for giving in-state tuition to the children of undocumented immigrants in his state, an achilles heel for the border-state governor with hard-line conservatives.

"There is nobody on this stage who has spent more time working on border security than I have. For a decade I’ve been the governor of a state with a 1200 mile border with Mexico," he said, adding he supported Arizona's immigration law and heavier patrols on the border.

"But if you say that we should not educate children who have come into our state for no other reason that they have been brought there by no fault of their own I don’t think you have a heart," Perry continued. "We need to be educating these children because they will become a drag on our society... I still support it greatly."

In response, the Republican crowd in Orlando, Fla., booed heartily.

Don 09-22-2011 11:49 PM

Thank God people are willing to attack this thread bare phony GOP globalist. He is no better than Obama.

Patriotic Army Mom 09-23-2011 07:27 AM

I would have booed also! I like the man, but not that message!

DerailAmnesty.com 09-24-2011 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patriotic Army Mom (Post 17825)
I would have booed also! I like the man, but not that message!

PAM, I would suggest to you that that message reflects on the man and his character. It's not just that he voices support for in-state tuition for illegal aliens, it's that he is lying about it.

His explanation about that policy, that he gave at the debate in Tampa, included two references that Texas made a decision that it doesn't matter what a kid's "last name sounds" like if he wants to go to college. That is just a flat-out misrepresentation. Hispanics are not, and were not before Perry instituted the in-state tuition for illegals policy in 2001, prevented from going to Texas state colleges. People with ethnic last names were neither barred from school nor charged more to attend. The test for in-state tuition before 2001 was legal residency, not ethnicity or race.

Perry pulled the race card when he suggested ethnicity was a legal impediment to going to a university in his state.

Further, both in Tampa and Orlando, Perry stated that providing the taxpayer subsidized tuition rate was the right move because A) it would allow these kids to become productive members of society, and B) keep them off "the dole" in Texas.

PAM, when those kids graduate they can't work, as a matter of law. There will be no IBM jobs, no positions with Apple Computers, Hess Oil, law firms or accounting agencies. The only way that could occur would be for the kids to commit substantial fraud (I.D. theft, forgery, etc.). Further, illegal aliens cannot receive welfare ("the dole") in Texas w/o, again, committing considerable fraud.

Perry is lying.

He is also lying when he says that they don't get the in-state tuition rate unless they are "working toward citizenship" or "on their way toward citizenship." That is substantively false, as well. It's a matter of law. A person who enters the U.S. illegally cannot regularize his residency w/o going home and applying to enter lawfully (and waiting) like everyone else. It doesn't matter if marriage to a U.S. citizen occurs, or anything else. It's not legally possible under current immigration regulations/standards. These kids are not "on their way" toward citizenship. They are simply signing a piece of paper that says they will obtain legal residency when they can. AB540 in California has students sign a similar document. It's bullsh--. That can't happen (w/o an amnesty), as a matter of law.

Every time this guy talks about immigration, PAM, he is misleading and misrepresenting. Every time. He is John McCain with better hair. I would suggest to you he's not worthy of your liking him b/c he keeps trying to decieve you and other people in the audience when he tries to justify the in-state tuition situation in the Lone Star State. It's not that he supports it, it's that he so dishonest in his efforts to explain it.

Ayatollahgondola 09-24-2011 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com (Post 17843)
He is also lying when he says that they don't get the in-state tuition rate unless they are "working toward citizenship" or "on their way toward citizenship." That is substantively false, as well. It's a matter of law. A person who enters the U.S. illegally cannot regularize his residency w/o going home and applying to enter lawfully (and waiting) like everyone else. It doesn't matter if marriage to a U.S. citizen occurs, or anything else. It's not legally possible under current immigration regulations/standards. These kids are not "on their way" toward citizenship. They are simply signing a piece of paper that says they will obtain legal residency when they can. AB540 in California has students sign a similar document. It's bullsh--. That can't happen (w/o an amnesty), as a matter of law..

Sorry, but I've seen that they can. I've seen it up close and personal. Hell, there's a recent statement on my youtube page by one of those kids that argued with me at our recent billboard event that echoed that. Her parents entered illegally and got regularized, and are now applying for citizenship.

DerailAmnesty.com 09-24-2011 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayatollahgondola (Post 17845)
Sorry, but I've seen that they can. I've seen it up close and personal. Hell, there's a recent statement on my youtube page by one of those kids that argued with me at our recent billboard event that echoed that. Her parents entered illegally and got regularized, and are now applying for citizenship.

This kid is lying to you, Davi. I've been down this road legally before. You can speak to an immigration lawyer (which I'm not).

There are different sets of rules that apply to people who enter legally but are now unlawfully present (i.e. overstaying a visa), as opposed to people who swim or climb over at the border. People who unlawfully enter cannot gain legal residency w/o going home. Most kids from Mexico fall into the first category.

Ayatollahgondola 09-24-2011 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com (Post 17846)
This kid is lying to you, Davi. I've been down this road legally before. You can speak to an immigration lawyer (which I'm not).

There are different sets of rules that apply to people who enter legally but are now unlawfully present (i.e. overstaying a visa), as opposed to people who swim or climb over at the border. People who unlawfully enter cannot gain legal residency w/o going home. Most kids from Mexico fall into the first category.

Once again, I've witnessed it.

DerailAmnesty.com 09-24-2011 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayatollahgondola (Post 17849)
Once again, I've witnessed it.

Whatever you've witnessed, there is some other piece to the puzzle or something you were either lied to about or not told. Speak to an immigration lawyer. He or she can relate what I've told you.

Patriotic Army Mom 09-24-2011 08:08 AM

Thanks SZ. Will remember what you've said. All I have to do is talk to my sister and know better.

Rim05 09-24-2011 09:48 AM

I stay too busy to post very much any more however, my opinion of Perry is very low. Anyone who attends, graduates from college should be able to speak proper English. I can't stand his, "Am onna" do this and that.

I have followed Perry since his last election and I don't think any one will want him for President. He is as arrogrant as can be and just loves all the big mouth blabber he gives.
The latest name I hear him called is Scary Perry.

I have watched all three debates so I am aware of what all of them are saying.

I don't know why we can not have at least one or two quality candidates.

Kathy63 09-24-2011 02:14 PM

Perry's inopportune comment is his Howard Dean Scream moment. He is trying to wiggle out of it and can't. He won't. It did him in.

He forgot for a moment that he is applying for a NATIONAL office not state, not Texas not where there are a lot of illegals and their voting relatives. Perry told parents in Nebraska, Kansas, Montana, and all of the other 49 states that if they are heartless if they object to paying a subsidy for the children of illegals to go to Texas A&M when their own children can't go without paying full price.

It might sell in Texas, but it's a loser nationally.

ilbegone 09-25-2011 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rim05 (Post 17863)


I don't know why we can not have at least one or two quality candidates.

What's on the ballot is what the parties present us.

We have two extremist parties which fight over control of the nation's future, and any candidate which strays too far from his party's position will usually be politically destroyed. The third parties are generally comprised of kooks or otherwise don't have a snowballs chance in hell of successfully fielding a candidate.

Politics is a nasty business, with all the character assassination and backstabbing that goes on and such. The guy who shakes your hand and convincingly assures you of his deep personal concern for you while kissing your baby as well as your ass usually isn't such a nice guy, he can't be and make it in politics.

I believe that to get more than lip service towards meaningfully enforcing immigration law means cleaning out the rat's nests which decide unwritten party policy - both of them.

It has to be negative experience for employers to hire illegals and public employees have to be punished for doling out public services to the illegally present, which mean that politicians have to feel some sort of pain for supporting employers and governmental hacks who do so. That means cleaning out the back room rats who give blessings and marching orders to politicians.

Everyone is focused on the national picture, but in reality it begins with city hall and the county seat, the most unobserved political units in America. Get the small ones, and the big ones fall with them. America was built on the township, and that's how America will be reclaimed by its citizens.

Rim05 09-25-2011 01:06 PM

I am remembering when Perry gathered about 30,000 followers and prayed for rain, he got more fires. :confused:

wetibbe 09-26-2011 05:14 AM

Perry is sinking:
 
I, too, cringe when I hear Perry's bad grammar. I certainly don't mind a Texas accent but the lingo he uses makes his sound like a dumb hick.

Some Texas singer Buddy said of Perry: He has the heart of a Democrat and the mind of a Republican !!!!!????? That must make him some sort of a political mongrel. He started out as a Democrat and converted to Republicanism. But obviously he still retains much of the ingrained Democrat mentality.

It seems that the straw pole results were more a repudiation of Perry than an approval of Cain. Cain siphoned off many votes and essentially left Romney trailing Perry slightly. But Michelle Bachmann finishing dead last is quite a mystery. I think basically this illustrates that the straw polls are essentially worthless and misleading regional attitudes of very small groups of Republicans. The straw poll was estimated at 2,900 to 3,500 GOP.

Perry's thorny dilemma is that he apparently wants to appeal to a broad spectrum to capture both the liberal and conservative votes. This doesn't work in Uber-Conservative straw polls and debates for the Republican nomination. The straw polls are not National elections where Perry can get liberal, Latino, Independent and Conservative votes from the whole spectrum of all voters all over the nation.

As Bill Buckley said: "I vote for the Conservative who can get elected".

Interestingly it is looking more like Obama may not run for a second term.

Twoller 09-26-2011 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wetibbe (Post 17892)
....

Interestingly it is looking more like Obama may not run for a second term.

Obama isn't going to go for the second term? Where do you get that?

wetibbe 09-27-2011 05:34 AM

Obama second term
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Twoller (Post 17896)
Obama isn't going to go for the second term? Where do you get that?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>

Twoller:

From lots of places but generally three areas:

#1. My own deductions and observations. Obama is apparently on a path of self destruction politically. Practically everything he says now offends everyone. Even his own blacks are now down on him. The Jews. The left. The youth.

#2. Numerous pundits all over the Internet. Dick Morris included.

Alexander Cornswalled: Obama admits he won't run in 2012, signs ...


http://www.cornswalled.com/2009/03/o...012-signs.html


Mar 20, 2009 – Obama admits he won't run in 2012, signs post administration book deal ... is an admission he won't have a second term, President Obama has ...


Why Obama won't seek 2nd term

www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=312393

Jun 18, 2011 – Why Obama won't seek 2nd term ... to win a second term. Just look at the way he is already second-guessing his announcement to run again. ...

Cavuto's prediction: Obama won't run for a second term « Hot Air

hotair.com/.../cavutos-prediction-obama-wont-run-for-a-second-term...

Aug 23, 2010 – Cavuto's prediction: Obama won't run for a second term.

Farah predicts: Obama won't run for 2nd term; cites birth certificate ...


http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/.../f...ont-run-for-2n...


Jun 19, 2011 – Despite President Obama's announcement that he's running for a second term, Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily's not buying it. Farah writes: I ...

Obama May Not Run For A Second Term


www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/2779730/posts


Sep 17, 2011 – ... to comments. Obama May Not Run For A Second Term .... If Obama is replaced by a white person of either sex, blacks in general won't vote. ...
President Obama won't run in 2012: A reader's prediction | NJ.com

blog.nj.com › Letters to The Star-Ledger › Letters to the Editor

Sep 6, 2011 – Traditionally, incumbent presidents always seek a second term. A recent exception ... President Obama won't run in 2012: A reader's prediction ...

Why Obama won't run for a second term | Socialism is not the Answer
socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/.../why-obama-wont-run-for-...

Why Obama won't run for a second term. Posted on July 22, 2010 by 1dragon| 10 Comments. Great American Journal. Obama has no intention of running for a ...

Clinton says she won't serve in Obama's second term | The Cable

thecable.foreignpolicy.com/.../clinton_says_she_won_t_serve_in_ob...

Mar 16, 2011 – Clinton says she won't serve in Obama's second term ... to be defense secretary or vice president and will not run for the presidency in 2016. ...

Clinton says no to second term – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com ...

politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/.../clinton-running-for-preside...

Mar 16, 2011 – I think there is a likelihood that the Dems may ask Obama no to run for a .... They sure as Hades won't get a second term most of them will be ...

Why Obama won't seek 2nd term ~ By Joseph Farah


http://www.boanow.com/why-obama-wont...-joseph-farah/


Jun 18, 2011 – However, it turns out that it isn't really a matter of whether or not I agree with Joseph's premise that Obama won't run for the second term. ...

#3. Obama's eligibility. His birth certificate release has been proven a fraud. Now his social security number cannot be verified as his own. Numerous states are now passing local laws requiring positive certification which he will not be able to provide.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved