Good News from Costa Mesa ACLU LOSES
http://www.ocregister.com/news/acost...y-meeting.html
SANTA ANA A federal jury determined today that the city of Costa Mesa and Mayor Allan Mansoor did not violate an immigration advocate's right to free speech when he was ejected from a 2006 council meeting. The verdict, which came after about an hour of deliberations, concludes Benito Acosta's federal trial against the city and Mansoor. Acosta alleged that his first amendment rights were violated when he was cut off abruptly from speaking during a contentious January 2006 meeting. Article Tab : Coyotl Tezcalipoca, 25, of Costa Mesa, a member of Tonatzin Collective just before being arrested by Costa Mesa police during Tuesday's council meeting. Coyotl Tezcalipoca, 25, of Costa Mesa, a member of Tonatzin Collective just before being arrested by Costa Mesa police during Tuesday's council meeting. ARMANDO BROWN, THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER costa, a Latino activist who goes by the name Coyotl Tezcatlipoca, was backed by the Southern California branch of the American Civil Liberties Union. "We're disappointed with the jury's verdict, but we are happy to have had our day in court," said Belinda Escobosa Helzer, one of Acosta's ACLU attorneys. Acosta was an Orange Coast College student when he spoke at the council meeting against a proposal to allow Costa Mesa police to enforce federal immigration policies. He was among nearly two dozen speakers on the issue, which had thrust the city into the limelight. Acosta was arrested at the council meeting on suspicion of disturbing an assembly, interfering with the meeting and resisting police officers. In 2005, city leaders also voted to shutter a city-sponsored job center, which citizens argued attracted illegal immigrants and wasted taxpayers' money. The center opened in 1988 in response to complaints about loitering, traffic problems and unsafe conditions when day laborers – mostly Latino – searched for work on streets and at parks. During the trial, which began Dec. 2, Acosta's attorneys alleged that Mansoor allowed Jim Gilchrist, co-founder of the Minutemen, to speak over his allotted three minutes during public comments. Acosta's comments, however, were cut off by the mayor after the activist urged audience members to stand up. Mansoor testified that he was just trying to keep the meeting safe and orderly. Attorneys argued that Acosta suffered physical injuries, emotional trauma and public humiliation as a result of being removed from the council chambers by police officers. Two years ago, the city's criminal case against Acosta, now a UC Irvine student, was dismissed because the city's prosecutor was not sworn in when the case was filed. "We still believe in the principle of free speech rights and the right of residents of Costa Mesa and other cities across Orange County to openly criticize their city officials," Helzer said. Acosta's attorneys will review the trial proceedings and determine if there are any grounds for appeal, Helzer said. Acosta wants to now focus on his final exams, she said. |
And it was decided by a jury from Santa Ana too,
Now he knows what humiliation really is:D |
Good. It's about time.
Here are some excerpts from a Commentary piece by Gustavo Arellano a couple weeks after the 1-3-06 Monsoor incident. It seems the subject lacks sensible timing concerning when to shut up... Quote:
Arellano works for the OC Register and writes the !Ask a Mexican! column. He also has a book out by that title. |
This is exactly what their goal is, to use up our tax dollars on court costs and bog down our court system with frivolous cases.
|
Quote:
I doubt that any of these guys really want to go to jail or pay fines and incur legal expenses to "prove" their point. Jail is a nasty place, and they'll find a very unpleasant reality about racism and violence in Jail. |
Quote:
This was after the fact. This case brought by the ACLU would not have put the phony Indian in jail, but instead was a tactic to intimidate anyone trying to stand up to the invaders and threaten or actually put them in jail. It was a separate case from the charges filed against the phony Indian. The ACLU, Mexico and so many other are using our court system against us. They know that many of the charges and cases being filed will overwhelm the system and it works in their favor. First by gaining more time, and second by just granting what ever they want because they are entitled to their day in court and it can't be provided. Similar to letting so many prisoners out early because there's no room. You just overwhelm the system and get what you want. If they're not given what they want then they can, and will, cry they're victims and have not been given proper justice in our courts. |
Quote:
|
Aclu
Apart from the fact that the ACLU is polluted with left wing radicals, they are also attorneys. "Some" may actually harbor do good-er sentiments and may further be ideologues. However, I have come to the sad conclusion that all of this incessant attacking and suing of Towns and others over illegal immigrants over the attempts to enforce immigration laws stems from two basic causes:
#1. A shocking number of academics are left leaning, liberal progressives. The universities are brain washing the students. Some swallow it and some don't. Those are the younger ones still in college. #2. Lawyers being lawyers, they go for the gold. Deep down inside it's the money that talks loudest. They attack Towns and win huge cash awards. The temptation's is overwhelming. They do it first and foremost for the money. Those are the older ones. They are like vultures always circling for carrion. The ACLU, in my opinion, is very subversive, very dangerous and very damaging to our country. They are in a category with the likes of the PRLDEF and MALDEF. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved