This is what passes for a Conservative?
 

I'm glad I found out in time. I was about to put a Carly sticker on my car ...


An excerpt from an internet report about the recent Boxer/Fiorina debate held at St. Mary's College:

The candidates also sparred over immigration. Fiorina reiterated her objections to comprehensive immigration reform. But in a nod to the importance of Latino voters, who make up 18% of the state's likely voters, Fiorina said for the first time Wednesday night that she would support the so-called DREAM Act, which would allow certain undocumented youths to earn legal status by attending college or serving in the military.

It was a rare moment of agreement: Boxer is a co-sponsor of that bill.

Once again, the "two party system" has spoken loud and clear.

Term limits and the elimination of party records in voter registration is the solution. Kill the primary elections and this kind of rot will go away.

She supports the DREAM Act but opposes amnesty? That's sort of like going on a crash diet while dining three times a day at Burger King.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elKVHcsxd0Q

I'm going to upload some docs I've dug up that are relative to the political spectrum, and place them in threads fit them, such as this one.

Attached below is the 1998 statements of purpose from all the registered parties at the time. Take a look and see whether they lived up to their stated purpose