Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That assertion is flat out wrong. You have misstated federal law pertaining to birthright citizenship. Obama's mother is a U.S. citizen; further, his father was lawfully in the United States on a student visa (two currently irrelevant legal points). Obama was born on U.S. soil. Hence, he's a citizen. Not only is what you have stated inaccurate, it would be inaccurate if the law was modified in the fashion many border security activists would like to see undertaken. Currently, a child is legally a U.S. citizen if he is born on U.S. soil, regardless of his parents' unlawful residency status. Many individuals feel this is the result of a perversion/misinterpretation of the Civil War Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. They opine that a person should not receive legal residency if born in our country, if one or more parents is an illegal alien. Even under this formula, Barack Obama would be a citizen. So Twoller, you've got me confused. Assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, why isn't he a citizen? |
Quote:
Then there is the question of the Indonesian adoption. Indonesian law provides that only citizens can attend school. ozbama went to school in Indonesia. Those two facts lend itself to the ordinary conclusion that little Barry was adopted by Sotero and made an Indonesian citizen and in fact during his time in Indonesia he did go by the name of Barak Sotero. According to US law, a parent cannot voluntarily change the citizenship of an American born child. The child has only to file proper documents with the government reclaiming his citizenship status. There is not only no documentation to clear up the adoption question but whether or not he was required to or did file anything reclaiming his status as citizen of the United States. The right questions aren't being asked. It isn't so much that college and university records don't exist. It is not quite as bad as the evil little creature plopped down and became an overnight presidebt, it is as bad as someone having backtracked and removed everything in his background. Why, what is in those records that the great and powerful ozbama doesn't want seen? What could it be that he would rather remain the subject of attacks on his citizenship than confronted and put to rest? It is something that he at least considers worse than the speculation. Up until this presidebt every other one as a candidate, had to produce and open up all their records. We know what John Kerry's school records say, we know that Al Gore was rather lazy and didn't get good grades. We know that George Bush got rather good grades compared to his opposition. We have no idea what Little Barry's records say at all. He has gotten a pass at producing them. Just like he has gotten a pass at making public the results of his annual physical exam and tax returns. I am personally convinced that ozbama is not a citizen, I am absolutely convinced that there is something that he is hiding and would like to know what that is. |
I cannot speak for Obama or anyone else, however, TRY TO FORCE ME TO DO ANYTHING AND SEE HOW FAR YOU GET. I have no idea why he has his records sealed but again , after all I have read for the last 2 plus years of all the discontent I will not bother to state what I think the reason is. ;)
|
Quote:
As an aside, this is one of the rabbit holes the border security movement has gone down, and lost a great deal of credibility due to it. |
When dealing with a criminal enterprise it is always wise to use any weapon available.
Like this. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32752.html “We just hit him with a freight train,” one Democratic official familiar with the anti-Coats effort said Monday. “It’s Politics 101: Frame the guy early.” Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories...#ixzz0fG0ETcSf It's the democratic political process FRAME THE GUY EARLY. Considering that democrats want ozbama to take the next step, which is not only frame the guy but take out the opposition by assassination, gagsta style, it will be interesting to see how the public puts up with it. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/...ans/index.html Channel your inner Al Capone and go gangsta against your foes. Let 'em know that if they aren't with you, they are against you, and will pay the price. Democrats are basically criminals. Accusing ozbama of not being a citizen is mild, really mild compared with encouraging the government to engage in assassinations. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Eegad! Stop Mischaracterizing the Eligibility Issue
Link
Eegad! Stop Mischaracterizing the Eligibility Issue IT’S NOT JUST THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE! by V. Harlow, blogging at http://www.vventures.net (Feb. 10, 2010) — The eligibility issue has constantly been mischaracterized as a “citizenship” issue or a “birth certificate” issue, and major media outlets keep playing on this same theme over and over, ridiculing those who want the truth. I suspect they are partially driven by fear: fear they won’t get interviews, fear they won’t get invitations, fear they won’t get to cover important issues if this issue is included in what they cover. Even Fox News continues to ridicule and mischaracterize this very important Constitutional issue. Can we attack this administration on other valid issues? Yes, of course. I don’t advocate doing anything less. It’s not right to push aside the very valid and important Constitutional issue of the eligibility of the current resident of White House to hold the job as though it is of no consequence. There have been people scoffing for over a year now, yet lawsuits continue. The issue is law. The highest office in the land, the one responsible for upholding our laws and protecting our freedoms, is the issue. Most reasonable people don’t question the “citizenship” of Obama. The Constitution has special requirements for holders of the presidency. One of them is “natural born citizen.” That is a higher standard than “citizen.” It is a higher standard than “native citizen.” Some people signed off on Obama’s qualification rather cavalierly either knowingly or carelessly. They need to be held to account. It’s easy to ridicule and destroy the reputations and careers of people fighting this battle, but it’s wrong. Orly Taitz, regardless of whether or not one questions her professionalism, does not deserve the treatment she has received from anonymous callers, malicious supporters of Obama, or from major media outlets. She comes willing and determined to defend our Constitution, while so many charged with that responsibility have forsaken it completely. Donofrio, Pidgeon, Berg, Kreep, and others fighting the battle do not deserve the ridicule. The American people overwhelmingly want to know the truth. An honest hearing is required. © 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved