That's some good thinking, but to truly debunk the argument that we need illegal immigrants is to simply point out that we don't need them. It is much easier to see that the economy and our labor situation is carefully engineered to create jobs for them. This is why it doesn't make any sense to argue that throwing people off welfare and forcing them to take the jobs that illegals do will cure the illegal immigration problem. The illegals are here because we have influential citizens who want them here because they are actively applying our economy to serve as a welfare state for some other country's economy.

We don't need illegal immigrant labor bacause we don't need the jobs they are doing, the jobs exist only for the purpose of benefiting immigrant labor. If we get rid of them, then the people responsible for hiring them will make the jobs go away too. And also, most of the people hiring illegals are themselves immigrants, especially where the language of the country of origin is not English.

Japan was not defeated in WWII, not by atomic bombs or anything else - they would have fought on until they were exterminated.

The Emperor saved his people by by telling them to stop fighting.

Illegals wouldn't be here if it weren't for exploitive white American employers and white American politicians who pander to them, it's that simple and should be blindingly obvious. The answer to the problem should also obvious to anyone who can look past their own nose and put two and two together to make four.

Besides, I don't defend illegals. I merely point out that your obvious bias is counterproductive to solving the problem of illegal migration.

Besides, my ancestors are of northern European origins, with the addition of Southeastern American Indian in the late 1800's. My last foreign ancestor entered prior to 1900.

Here is an example of putting two and two together:

I don't entirely agree with the statement, but it's far more true than not. And it has a lot more thought going into it than